Summary:
"Privacy is a myth believed by the uninitiated."
Is
anyone free on planet earth?
My
penetrating article on the subject, "Is Africa Free?" must wait,
while I devote keen attention to a relevant issue affecting our little race.
Our
hearts palpitate with an idea that we are free people, and this does not even
broach the lifelong conundrum of the debate: Are we free or determined? The
pellucid focus here is whether we are actually free from overt and covert eyes
that perennially trail our shadows and lineaments.
Today,
there are still some who maintain a granite belief in the shifting illusion
called privacy. As it is, time and again, news stories raze down what seemed to
be impermeable personal castles, jolting the average person in the process. And
thus, without gibbering in circles, I will posit a pithy and poignant belief:
Watchmen have bought the "right" to watch over us—without our
co-operation!
Indeed,
through a medley of sophisticated contrivances and old-fashioned techniques,
they have, and will conspire to constantly monitor us from our cradle till we
cross over and join Erebus's cart through chthonic realms.
Whether
we are in the supposed privacy of our homes chatting on phone, somebody is
grading our conversation. Or, browsing the internet, some uninvited person
follows every keystroke all the way through. Out there in the streets, there
are CCTVs monitoring our every move. Even our postage does not escape; not to
mention whether the people we meet (online or offline) are who they pretend to be.
In fact, we are under incessant surveillance throughout our breathing lives.
Modern practicalities have seen us sold to others who know where we live, what
we drink, eat, say, and even wear. In effect, they know everything about us.
Through
an imposed ratiocination, I have dropped the scales and unfurled my belief in
privacy, and accepted that we are just never going to be free from monitoring;
it is the new form of omnipresent morass we are all stuck in. In fact, there
remains a worrying capacity of "buyers" to continue such a peeled eye
enterprise.
In
my belief, my data has been bought by someone either for legitimate or
illegitimate purposes. And while I am not comfortable with it, I know this is
the modern world that civilisation has supposedly carved for us. Some will
belligerently contest such monitoring, as tenacious libertarians like to, and
even the masses may be promised a modicum of sanity through passed laws; but as
to whether the laws work as well as purported, is beyond the circumference of our
concentration.
The
long procession of "buyers" who with equal skill and guile keep the
vehicle of monitoring chugging along, include those who report, those who
accumulate, those who analyse, and even those who pass judgement or take
action; all these and more are right next to us, even when we believe we are
outside their inexhaustible perimeter.
In
light of the foregoing, when I hear the word privacy, it bestirs a
blast of guffaw from my inner recesses. Yes, I chortle, as in my view, there is
no such thing as privacy. Or, is there?
For
one thing, it is certain that those who assume a cloak of necessity, and are
emboldened by intriguing state machinery, and in turn employ intrusive
investigative methods to eavesdrop, will justify their intelligence gathering
as being for the prevention or countering of espionage, crime, terrorism and
sabotage, from the activities of agents of foreign powers, and from actions
intended to overthrow or undermine parliamentary democracy by political,
industrial or violent means. Contrarily, it is equally obvious that the same
mechanisms aid criminal organisations to plan and commit crimes such as robbery
and kidnapping; so do businesses to gather intelligence, as well as private
investigators, for their moot purposes.
It
is a futile and wanton waste of valuable time to rage on like a juddering
juggernaut about the ethics of such. While I may please many uninitiated folk,
I shall persuade none of those who hold the "keys".
Perhaps
someone will someday convince me that we are actually free. But, having
surveyed the horizon of happenings, on a personal level, I have concluded
otherwise, and that privacy is a myth only ignorant people believe they have or
enjoy.
Only
if some sensible person will believe this reasoned view; perhaps they will save
themselves from saying or doing what will only be in the open in a few seconds.
On that exalted plane, for example, a story in the Guardian about judges who
had watched pornography on their office computers would have been a non-event.
In
a true scheme of affairs, the final word on this matter has been wrapped in a
timeless truth by One who lived the noblest life, who cautioned: "For
there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall
not be known. Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in
the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be
proclaimed upon the housetops."
In
essence, cautious souls will follow such stainless wisdom, and avoid being
caught in a swirl of unnecessary distractions and reputation damage.
I
shall return with my talking drums!
Angelina K. Morrison is interested in national development, true religion, and self-improvement. She enjoys thinking, and writes stories only when the muse grips her. Her first short story, Gravellatina is a breathtaking five-part series available now at Amazon. You can email her at angelinakm75@gmail.com, or find her at www.angelinakmorrison.blogspot.com or Facebook page.
Sign up here with your email


ConversionConversion EmoticonEmoticon